The Electoral College

PLAINTIFF'S PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DATA EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT

MOTION TO PRESENT ORAL ARGUMENTS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

http://uselectors.wordpress.com/2008/12/21/electoral-college-lawsuit-update/
Democratizing the Electoral College Lawsuit

Ref: http://www.electors.us/

"Defendant's [Cheney] certain bias presentation for tabulation in the Hall of the House of Representatives, January 6, 2009, (Note: Now January 8, 2008) of majority polled presidential electors from unbounded southern states ungrounded in either state or federal law , constitutes a discriminatory abridgment of the voting rights of minority polled presidential electors based on race and/or party affiliation in violation of the mal-apportionment penalty clause pursuant to the United States Constitution (Amend. XIV§2) and statutory Code (2U.S.C.§6)."

- Gordon vs Cheney.- November 24th, 2008

• 
  The civil action seeks relief against the defendant, Vice President Cheney, who will preside over the tabulation of "unbound Southen electoral states" who by practice, unsupported by state or federal statute, traditionally award Presidential Electors on a winner-take-all basis.
• The civil action alternatively seeks the issuance of a court order providing proportional apportionment of unbound presidential electors.
  

Note: A civil action to protect the voting rights of presidential electors and the voters they represent was filed in the US District Court for the District of Columbia (1:08-cv-01294) on July 28, 2008, by Asa Gordon, executive director of the Douglass Institute of Government to commemorate the Century and Two Score years anniversary of the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.